Traditional NAS benchmarks often focus on file transfer over network which indeed is the core use case for most. But when desktop usage is declining more and more tasks are shifted to NAS devices and this means new capabilities are needed, running virtual machines and media playback is no longer exotic or a niche.
NAS benchmarks needs to evolve to give relevant guidance to buyers for these new scenarios, network transfer performance is no longer enough to make a decision. This need is emphasized by the huge difference in performance between different devices, for devices sometimes at similar price.
A very basic test can be run on almost any linux based NAS unit. It doesn't nearly give complete information but it can give a very rough estimate of single thread CPU performance, it's not a good complete benchmark, but it's better than nothing:
time $(i=0; while (( i < 999999 )); do (( i ++ )); done)Results for a few Synology devices (lower time is better):
DS115J | 68s |
DS212 | 67s |
DS213 | 59s |
DS214+ | 42s |
DS412+ | 22s |
DS413J | 67s |
DS414 | 40s |
DS415+ | 14s |
DS416play | 12s |
DS718+ | 7.7s |
DS916+ | 11s |
DS918+ | 7.8s |
DS1512+ | 22s |
DS1812+ | 21s |
DS1815+ | 13s |
DS3018xs | 4.1s |
RS3617RPxs | 3.5s |
As the results show, devices have vastly different CPU capabilities despite all of them capable of transferring files at very high speed.
Inga kommentarer:
Skicka en kommentar